SuperTutor
$15/per page/Negotiable
PICOT- population- Emergency Dept. patients, I intervention- Advanced handwashing education,
compared to standard handwashing, Outcome- decreased in Health Acquired Infections, Time- 6months Details:
While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue
they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables
students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.
A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what
is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the
earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 7501,000 word review that includes the following sections:
1. Title page
2. Introduction section
3. A comparison of research questions
4. A comparison of sample populations
5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center.
Literature Review
2
1
Less than
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
0.00%
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00% 80.0 %Content
10.0 %
An introductionAn introductionAn introductionAn introductionAn introduction
Introduction
is not present. is present, but is present, and is present, and is present, and
it does not
it relates to the it relates to the it relates to the
relate to the
body of the
body of the
body of the
body of the
paper. There is paper.
paper.
paper.
nothing in the Information
Information presented in the presented in the
introduction to introduction introduction is
entice the
provides
intriguing and
reader to
incentive for encourages the
continue
the reader to reader to
reading.
continue
continue
reading.
reading.
A moderately
A cursory
A reflective
A comparison
thorough and
20.0 %
No comparison
though valid
and insightful
of research
valid
Comparison of of research
comparison of
comparison of
questions is
comparison of
Research
questions is
research
research
presented, but
research
Questions
presented.
questions is
questions is
it is not valid.
questions is
presented.
presented.
presented.
A moderately
A cursory
A reflective
A comparison
thorough and
20.0 %
No comparison
though valid
and insightful
of sample
valid
Comparison of of sample
comparison of
comparison of
populations is
comparison of
Sample
populations is
sample
sample
presented, but
sample
Populations
presented.
populations is
populations is
it is not valid.
populations is
presented.
presented.
presented.
A moderately
A comparison A cursory
A reflective
No comparison
thorough and
20.0 %
of the
though valid
and insightful
of the
valid
Comparison of
limitations of comparison of
comparison of
limitations of
comparison of
the Limitations
the study is
the limitations
the limitations
the study is
the limitations
of the Study
presented, but of the study is
of the study is
presented.
of the study is
it is not valid. presented.
presented.
presented.
A conclusion
A conclusion
A conclusion
A conclusion
No conclusion and
and
10.0 %
and
and
and
recommendatio
recommendatio
Conclusion and
recommendatio
recommendatio
recommendatio ns for further
ns for further
Recommendatio
ns for further
ns for further
ns for further research are
research are
ns for Further
research are
research are
research are
presented, but
valid and
Research
valid, but they
reflective and
presented.
they are not
moderately
are cursory.
insightful.
valid.
thorough.
15.0
%Organization
and
Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis
Paper lacks any Thesis is
Thesis is
Thesis is clear Thesis is
Development discernible
insufficiently apparent and and forecasts comprehensive
and Purpose
overall purpose developed or appropriate to the
and contains
or organizing vague. Purpose purpose.
development of the essence of
claim.
is not clear.
the paper.
the paper.
Thesis is
Thesis descriptive and
statement
reflective of the
makes the
arguments and
purpose of the
appropriate to
paper clear.
the purpose.
Argument is
orderly, but
may have a few
Argument
inconsistencies.
Statement of Sufficient
shows logical
The argument
purpose is not justification of
progressions. Clear and
presents
justified by the claims is
Techniques of convincing
minimal
conclusion. Thelacking.
argumentation argument that
justification of
conclusion
Argument lacks
are evident.
presents a
5.0 %
claims.
does not
consistent
There is a
persuasive
Argument Logic
Argument
support the
unity. There are
smooth
claim in a
and
logically, but
claim made. obvious flaws
progression of distinctive and
Construction
not thoroughly,
Argument is in the logic.
claims from
compelling
supports the
incoherent and Some sources
introduction to manner. All
purpose.
uses
have
conclusion.
sources are
Sources used
noncredible
questionable
Most sources authoritative.
are credible.
sources.
credibility.
are
Introduction
authoritative.
and conclusion
bracket the
thesis.
Some
Frequent and mechanical
Prose is largely
Surface errors repetitive
errors or typos free of
are pervasive mechanical
are present, but mechanical
5.0 %
enough that
errors distract they are not
errors, although Writer is
Mechanics of
they impede the reader.
overly
a few may be clearly in
Writing
communication Inconsistencies distracting to present. A
command of
(includes
of meaning.
in language
the reader.
variety of
standard,
spelling,
Inappropriate choice
Correct
sentence
written,
punctuation,
word choice or (register),
sentence
structures and academic
grammar,
sentence
sentence
structure and effective
English.
language use)
construction is structure, or
audiencefigures of
used.
word choice appropriate
speech are
are present.
language are used.
used.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper
Template is not Template is
Template is
Template is
All format
Format (use of used
used, but some used, and
fully used;
elements are
appropriate
appropriately elements are formatting is There are
correct.
style for the
or
missing or
correct,
virtually no
major and
documentation mistaken; lack although some errors in assignment) format is rarely of control with
minor errors formatting
followed
formatting is
may be present. style.
correctly.
apparent. 3.0 %
Documentation
Documentation
Sources are
Sources are
of sources is
of Sources
documented, as Sources are
completely and
inconsistent or
(citations,
appropriate to documented, as correctly
incorrect, as
footnotes,
assignment and appropriate to documented, as
Sources are not appropriate to
references,
style, although assignment and appropriate to
documented. assignment and
bibliography,
some
style, and
assignment and
style, with
etc., as
formatting
format is
style, and
numerous
appropriate to
errors may be mostly correct. format is free
formatting
assignment and
present.
of error.
errors.
style)
100 % Total
Weightage
Capstone how teaching can increase handwashing compliance verses no teaching
THESE ARE THE REFERENCES FOR PAPER
Aziz, A. (2014). Hand hygiene compliance for patient safety. British Journal Of Healthcare Management,
20(9), 428-434.
de Oliveira, A. C., & de Paula, A. O. (2014). FACTORS RELATED TO POOR ADHERENCE TO HAND HYGIENE
IN HEALTHCARE DELIVERY: A REFLECTION. Ciencia, Cuidado E Saude, 13(1), 185-189.
doi:10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v13i1.13410
Ford, Eric W., Brian T. Boyer, Nir Menachemi, and Timothy R. Huerta. 2014. "Increasing Hand Washing
Compliance With a Simple Visual Cue." American Journal Of Public Health 104, no. 10: 1851-1856.
CINAHL Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed June 27, 2017).
How diligent monitoring improves hand-washing. (2014). Canadian Nursing Home, 25(1), 22.
KARASH, J. A. (2017). Hand Hygiene Do's & Don'ts. H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks, 91(5), 39-42.
Neo, J. J., Sagha-Zadeh, R., Vielemeyer, O., & Franklin, E. (2016). Evidence-based practices to increase
hand hygiene compliance in health care facilities: An integrated review. American Journal Of Infection
Control, 44(6), 691. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2015.11.034
Pincock, T., Bernstein, P., Warthman, S., & Holst, E. (n.d). Bundling hand hygiene interventions and
measurement to decrease health care-associated infections. American Journal Of Infection Control,
40(4), S18-S27.
The importance of hand hygiene in preventing the spread of infection. (2014). Journal of Community
Nursing, 28(2), 75-78.
Walker, J. L., Sistrunk, W. W., Higginbotham, M. A., Burks, K., Halford, L., Goddard, L., & ... Finley, P. J.
(2014). Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback.
American Journal Of Infection Control, 42(10), 1074-1078. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.018