The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 327 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 12843 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 12834 |
MBA, Ph.D in Management
Harvard university
Feb-1997 - Aug-2003
Professor
Strayer University
Jan-2007 - Present
Details:
In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have
been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content
focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply
evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically
oriented problem or issue in future practice.
Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it
applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone
change proposal:
1. Background
2. Problem statement
3. Purpose of the change proposal
4. PICOT
5. Literature search strategy employed
6. Evaluation of the literature
7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
9. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these
could be overcome
10. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created
Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper,
and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to
the portfolio components before submitting.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center. Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal
2
1
3
5
Less Than
4
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Excellent 90Satisfactory
Good 80-89%
0-71%
76-79%
100%
72-75%
89.00%
0.00%
79.00%
100.00%
75.00%
60.0 %Content
Background
Background
Background
section is
Background
section is
section is
present,
section is
present. Some present and
complete, and
Background present, but
minor details or complete. The incorporates
5.0 %
section is not incomplete or elements are submission
additional
Background
present.
otherwise
missing but the provides the relevant details
lacking in
omission(s) do basic
and critical
required detail. not impede
information
thinking to
understanding. required.
engage the
reader.
Problem
Problem
Problem
statement is
Problem
statement is
statement is
present,
statement is
present. Some present and
complete, and
Problem
present, but
minor details or complete. The incorporates
5.0 % Problem
statement is not incomplete or elements are submission
additional
Statement
present.
otherwise
missing but the provides the relevant details
lacking in
omission(s) do basic
and critical
required detail. not impede
information
thinking to
understanding. required.
engage the
reader.
Purpose of
Purpose of
Purpose of
change
Purpose of
change
change
proposal is
change
proposal is
proposal is
present,
Purpose of
proposal is
present. Some present and
complete, and
5.0 % Change
change
present, but
minor details or complete. The incorporates
Proposal
proposal is not incomplete or elements are submission
additional
Purpose
present.
otherwise
missing but the provides the relevant details
lacking in
omission(s) do basic
and critical
required detail. not impede
information
thinking to
understanding. required.
engage the
reader.
5.0 % PICOT PICOT is not PICOT is
PICOT is
PICOT is
PICOT is
present.
present, but
present. Some present and
present,
incomplete or minor details or complete. The complete, and
otherwise
elements are submission
incorporates
lacking in
missing but the provides the additional relevant details
omission(s) do basic
and critical
required detail. not impede
information
thinking to
understanding. required.
engage the
reader.
Literature
Literature
Literature
search strategy
search strategy
Literature
search strategy is present,
is present.
search strategy
is present and complete, and
Some minor
5.0 %
Literature
is present, but
complete. The incorporates
details or
Literature
search strategy incomplete or
submission
additional
elements are
Search Strategy is not present. otherwise
provides the relevant details
missing but the
lacking in
basic
and critical
omission(s) do
required detail.
information
thinking to
not impede
required.
engage the
understanding.
reader.
Literature
Literature
Literature
evaluation is
Literature
evaluation is evaluation is present,
evaluation is present. Some present and
complete, and
5.0 %
Literature
present, but
minor details or complete. The incorporates
Literature
evaluation is incomplete or elements are submission
additional
Evaluation
not present.
otherwise
missing but the provides the relevant details
lacking in
omission(s) do basic
and critical
required detail. not impede
information
thinking to
understanding. required.
engage the
reader.
Theory
Theory
Theory
utilization
Theory
utilization
utilization
content is
utilization
content is
content is
present,
5.0 %
content is
present. Some present and
complete, and
Utilization of Theory
present, but
minor details or complete. The incorporates
Change or
utilization is
incomplete or elements are submission
additional
Nursing Theory not present.
otherwise
missing but the provides the relevant details
(2.2)
lacking in
omission(s) do basic
and critical
required detail. not impede
information
thinking to
understanding. required.
engage the
reader.
5.0 % Proposed Implementation Implementation Implementation Implementation Implementation
Implementation plan is not
plan is present, plan is present. plan is present plan is present,
Plan with
present.
but incomplete Some minor and complete. complete, and
Outcome
or otherwise details or
The submission incorporates
Measures (3.2)
lacking in
elements are provides the additional
required detail. missing but the basic
relevant details
omission(s) do information
and critical thinking to
engage the
reader.
Identification
Identification Identification of potential
Identification of potential
of potential
barriers to plan
of potential
barriers to plan barriers to plan implementation
5.0 %
Identification barriers to plan implementation implementation with a
Identification of
of potential
implementation with a
with a
discussion
potential
barriers to plan with a
discussion
discussion
component is
barriers to plan
implementation discussion
component is component is present,
implementation,
and /or
component is present. Some present and
complete, and
and a discussion
discussion
present, but is minor details or complete. The incorporates
of how these
component is incomplete or elements are submission
additional
could be
not present.
otherwise
missing but the provides the relevant details
overcome (2.3)
lacking in
omission(s) do basic
and critical
required detail. not impede
information
thinking to
understanding. required.
engage the
reader.
Appendices are
5.0 %
Appendices are present,
Appendices
Appendices are Appendices are present and
complete, and
Inclusive of
present, but
present with complete. The incorporates
Practice
Appendices are incomplete or minor elements submission
additional
Immersion
not present.
otherwise
missing that do provides the relevant details
Clinical
lacking in
not impede
basic
and critical
Documentation
required detail. understanding. information
thinking to
(1.2)
required.
engage the
reader.
Final paper
Evidence of
Evidence of
does not
Incorporation Incorporation
incorporation
incorporation
demonstrate of research
of research
of research
of research
10.0 %
incorporation critique
critique
critique
critique
Evidence of
of feedback or feedback or
feedback and
feedback and
feedback and
Revision
evidence of
evidence of
evidence of
revision is
revision is
revision on
revision is
revision are
comprehensive
clearly
research
incomplete.
present.
and thoroughly
provided.
critiques.
developed.
30.0
%Organization
and
Effectiveness
10.0 % Thesis Paper lacks any Thesis is
Thesis is
Thesis is clear Thesis is
Development discernible
insufficiently apparent and and forecasts comprehensive
and Purpose
overall purpose developed or appropriate to the
and contains
or organizing vague. Purpose purpose.
development of the essence of
not impede
required.
understanding. claim. 10.0 %
Argument
Logic and
Construction 10.0 %
Mechanics of
Writing
(includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
language use) is not clear. the paper.
the paper.
Thesis is
Thesis
descriptive and
statement
reflective of the
makes the
arguments and
purpose of the
appropriate to
paper clear.
the purpose. Argument is
orderly, but
may have a few
Argument
inconsistencies.
Statement of Sufficient
shows logical
The argument
purpose is not justification of
progression. Clear and
presents
justified by the claims is
Techniques of convincing
minimal
conclusion. Thelacking.
argumentation argument
justification of
conclusion
Argument lacks
are evident.
presents a
claims.
does not
consistent
There is a
persuasive
Argument
support the
unity. There are
smooth
claim in a
logically, but
claim made. obvious flaws
progression of distinctive and
not thoroughly,
Argument is in the logic.
claims from
compelling
supports the
incoherent and Some sources
introduction to manner. All
purpose.
uses
have
conclusion.
sources are
Sources used
noncredible
questionable
Most sources authoritative.
are credible.
sources.
credibility.
are
Introduction
authoritative.
and conclusion
bracket the
thesis.
Frequent and Some
repetitive
mechanical
Prose is largely
Surface errors mechanical
errors or typos free of
are pervasive errors distract are present, but mechanical
enough that
the reader.
they are not
errors, although Writer is
they impede Inconsistencies overly
a few may be clearly in
communication in language
distracting to present. The command of
of meaning.
choice
the reader.
writer uses a standard,
Inappropriate (register) or
Correct and
variety of
written,
word choice or word choice arevaried sentence effective
academic
sentence
present.
structure and sentence
English.
construction is Sentence
audiencestructures and
used.
structure is
appropriate
figures of
correct but not language are speech.
varied.
employed. 10.0 %Format
5.0 % Paper
Template is not Appropriate
Appropriate
Format (use of used
template is
template is
appropriate
appropriately, used, but some used. Appropriate
template is
fully used. All format
elements are
correct. style for the
major and
assignment) elements are
or
Formatting is There are
missing or
documentation
correct,
virtually no
mistaken. A
format is rarely
although some errors in
lack of control
followed
minor errors formatting
with formatting
correctly.
may be present. style.
is apparent. 5.0 %
Documentation
Documentation
Sources are
Sources are
of sources is
of Sources
documented, as Sources are
completely and
inconsistent or
(citations,
appropriate to documented, as correctly
incorrect, as
footnotes,
assignment and appropriate to documented, as
Sources are not appropriate to
references,
style, although assignment and appropriate to
documented. assignment and
bibliography,
some
style, and
assignment and
style, with
etc., as
formatting
format is
style, and
numerous
appropriate to
errors may be mostly correct. format is free
formatting
assignment and
present.
of error.
errors.
style)
100 % Total
Weightage
PICOT- population- Emergency Dept. patinets, I intervention- Advanced handwashing education,
Compared to standard handwashing, Outcome- decreased in Health Acquired Infections, Time- 6months
THESE ARE THE REFERENCES FOR PAPER
Aziz, A. (2014). Hand hygiene compliance for patient safety. British Journal Of Healthcare Management,
20(9), 428-434.
de Oliveira, A. C., & de Paula, A. O. (2014). FACTORS RELATED TO POOR ADHERENCE TO HAND HYGIENE
IN HEALTHCARE DELIVERY: A REFLECTION. Ciencia, Cuidado E Saude, 13(1), 185-189.
doi:10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v13i1.13410
Ford, Eric W., Brian T. Boyer, Nir Menachemi, and Timothy R. Huerta. 2014. "Increasing Hand Washing
Compliance With a Simple Visual Cue." American Journal Of Public Health 104, no. 10: 1851-1856.
CINAHL Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed June 27, 2017).
How diligent monitoring improves hand-washing. (2014). Canadian Nursing Home, 25(1), 22.
KARASH, J. A. (2017). Hand Hygiene Do's & Don'ts. H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks, 91(5), 39-42.
Neo, J. J., Sagha-Zadeh, R., Vielemeyer, O., & Franklin, E. (2016). Evidence-based practices to increase
hand hygiene compliance in health care facilities: An integrated review. American Journal Of Infection
Control, 44(6), 691. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2015.11.034
Pincock, T., Bernstein, P., Warthman, S., & Holst, E. (n.d). Bundling hand hygiene interventions and
measurement to decrease health care-associated infections. American Journal Of Infection Control,
40(4), S18-S27. The importance of hand hygiene in preventing the spread of infection. (2014). Journal of Community
Nursing, 28(2), 75-78.
Walker, J. L., Sistrunk, W. W., Higginbotham, M. A., Burks, K., Halford, L., Goddard, L., & ... Finley, P. J.
(2014). Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback.
American Journal Of Infection Control, 42(10), 1074-1078. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.018
Â
-----------