The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 327 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 12843 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 12834 |
MBA, Ph.D in Management
Harvard university
Feb-1997 - Aug-2003
Professor
Strayer University
Jan-2007 - Present
Refute the statement below by using at least one example to show how the point is in error or illogical. Sum up the opposite point of view, the one you are proving in the last sentence to make a strong impact in the debate over the issue.
Â
Thesis: Fashion and identity are inseparable companions.
Point: "This can be simply proven by analyzing the reaction of people on the street to people wearing different types of clothing. The preference is always given to people dressed in "business style", personifying their dignity and seriousness in everything. This is one of the primary reasons that even the smallest companies make wearing a suit one of their requirements for their employees. The customers feel more confident in the presence of such "consultants." So, fashion is a very keen tool of manipulation while communicating, besides its importance in social class, culture, sex and gender relations."
Â
To be honest, I don't know how to refute the as it seems like this is something too real in this world.
-----------