CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 284 Weeks Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Computer Science Posted 10 Jul 2017 My Price 10.00

Writing Assignment, writing homework help

Question description

 

Check the attachment.

PROJECT PROPOSAL

Competency 405.2.1: Project Proposal – The candidate prepares a project proposal according to the guidelines specified in the program guide.


Task 2: Proposal

Introduction:


The technical writing assessment will consist primarily of a proposal for a major IT project. Your proposal serves two purposes. First, it allows you to demonstrate your competency in the technical writing domain. Second, it helps you organize your ideas for the project so you can complete the project as efficiently as possible. The proposal for your project will explain how you plan to approach and carry out your project. Your proposal will be evaluated on the necessary components and on the proficiency of your technical writing.

Your proposed project will take one of the following four formats (see the attached “Project Format Descriptions” for further information and project examples):
     •  intellectual product/service
     •  physical product/service
     •  event or activity
     •  system improvements or enhancements


Work performed on contract for a third party or for an employer is their property. You must obtain their permission to include the work. Your work for task 2 will not be evaluated until the appropriate form(s) in task 1 have been submitted.

Requirements:

A.  Identify a topic for your project that aligns with your degree program.
 

B.  Create a proposal (suggested length of 15–20 pages) that will be a narrative description of your project, including the following components:

1.  Cover Sheet: Provide a cover sheet for your proposal that includes the following elements:

•  project name

•  your name

•  your degree program

•  your student mentor’s name

2.  Introduction (suggested length of 2–4 pages): Provide an overview of your project.

3.  Review of Other Work (suggested length of 3–5 pages): Provide a review of what other third-party work has been done on this topic.

4.  Rationale (suggested length of 2–3 pages): Provide a rationale for your project.

5.  Systems Analysis and Methodology (suggested length of 2–4 pages): Provide a systems analysis and methodology by doing the following:

a.  Provide an analysis of the current state of the project environment.

b.  Provide a methodology for executing your project.

6.  Project Goals and Objectives (suggested length of 3–5 pages): Explain the goals and objectives for the project, including the following information:

•  identification of goals and objectives

•  description of goals and objectives

•  criteria that will be used to measure the objectives

7.  Project Deliverables (suggested length of 5–8 pages): Explain what types of deliverables your project will provide.
 

Note: Your project will include some sort of formal report. It will likely also include a technical IT product and/or a user’s manual or other documentation.
 

8.  Project Timeline with Milestones: Provide a projected timeline with milestones for your project.
 

C.  When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.


Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.

 

Evaluation for DDT TASK 2

DDT Task 2 (0215)

 

value: 0.00

value: 1.00

value: 2.00

value: 3.00

value: 4.00

Score/Level

Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.

The candidate provides weak articulation of response.

The candidate provides limited articulation of response.

The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.

The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

 

A. Topic

The candidate does not identify a topic for the project that aligns with the candidate’s degree program.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate identifies a topic for the project that aligns with the candidate’s degree program.

 

B1. Cover Sheet

The candidate does not provide a cover sheet for the proposal that includes the given elements.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate provides a cover sheet for the proposal that includes some of the given elements.

The candidate provides a cover sheet for the proposal that includes all of the given elements.

 

B2. Introduction

The candidate does not provide a logical overview of the project.

The candidate provides a logical overview of the project, with no detail.

The candidate provides a logical overview of the project, with limited detail.

The candidate provides a logical overview of the project, with adequate detail.

The candidate provides a logical overview of the project, with substantial detail.

 

B3. Review of Other Work

The candidate does not provide a review of what other third-party work has been done on the topic.

The candidate provides a review, with no detail, of what other third-party work has been done on the topic.

The candidate provides a review, with limited detail, of what other third-party work has been done on the topic.

The candidate provides a review, with adequate detail, of what other third-party work has been done on the topic.

The candidate provides a review, with substantial detail, of what other third-party work has been done on the topic.

 

B4. Rationale

The candidate does not provide a rationale for the project.

The candidate provides a rationale for the project, with no support.

The candidate provides a rationale for the project, with limited support.

The candidate provides a rationale for the project, with adequate support.

The candidate provides a rationale for the project, with substantial support.

 

B5a. Systems Analysis

The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of the current state of the project environment.

The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with no detail, of the current state of the project environment.

The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with limited detail, of the current state of the project environment.

The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with adequate detail, of the current state of the project environment.

The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial detail, of the current state of the project environment.

 

B5b. Methodology

The candidate does not provide an appropriate methodology for executing the project.

The candidate provides an appropriate methodology for executing the project, with no detail.

The candidate provides an appropriate methodology for executing the project, with limited detail.

The candidate provides an appropriate methodology for executing the project, with adequate detail.

The candidate provides an appropriate methodology for executing the project, with substantial detail.

 

B6. Project Goals and Objectives

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the goals and objectives for the project that includes the given information.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the goals and objectives for the project that includes the given information.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the goals and objectives for the project that includes the given information.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the goals and objectives for the project that includes the given information.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the goals and objectives for the project that includes the given information.

 

B7. Project Deliverables

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of what types of deliverables the project will provide.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of what types of deliverables the project will provide.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of what types of deliverables the project will provide.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of what types of deliverables the project will provide.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of what types of deliverables the project will provide.

 

B8. Project Timeline with Milestones

The candidate does not provide a projected timeline with milestones for the project.

The candidate provides a projected timeline with milestones, with no detail, for the project.

The candidate provides a projected timeline with milestones, with limited detail, for the project.

The candidate provides a projected timeline with milestones, with adequate detail, for the project.

The candidate provides a projected timeline with milestones, with substantial detail, for the project.

 

D. Sources

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text
citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text
citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor
deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and
references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the
candidate does not use sources.

 

 

IT CAPSTONE WRITTEN PROJECT

Competency 981.1-01: Capstone - The graduate integrates and synthesizes competencies from across the degree program and thereby demonstrates the ability to participate in and contribute value to the chosen professional field.


Task 2: Formal Report

Introduction:

Candidates completing the Bachelor of Science in Information Technology or any of the emphasis area programs are required to complete a capstone project. The approach to executing the project and completing the capstone report should be discussed with your course mentor. The purpose of the capstone project is to demonstrate your skills in the integration and synthesis of competencies in all domains required for your degree. You will demonstrate this by designing and developing a project based on your chosen format (e.g., intellectual product/service, physical product/service, event or activity, system improvement or enhancement). The project will consist of a formal report in which you elaborate on the components of your proposal and explain the actual development of your project.

Work performed on contract for a third party or for an employer is their property. You must obtain their permission to include the work. Your work for task 2 will not be evaluated until the appropriate form(s) in task 1 have been submitted.

Requirements:

A.  Identify a topic for your project that aligns with your degree program.
 

B.  Create a formal report (suggested length of 25–50 pages) in which you elaborate on the components of your proposal and explain the actual development of your project by doing the following:

1.  Cover Sheet: Provide a cover sheet for your project that includes the following elements:

•   project name

•   your name

•   your degree program

•   your student mentor’s name

2.  Introduction: Provide a logical overview of the actual development of your project.

a.  Include a precise description of your project.

b.  Include a thorough discussion of your review of other third-party work done on your chosen topic.

c.  Include a thorough discussion of your rationale for the project.

d.  Include a thorough discussion of your systems analysis and methodology for the project.

3.  Project Goals and Objectives: Explain why you did or did not accomplish the goals and objectives set for your project.

a.  Include a list of the goals and objectives identified in your proposal (i.e., Task 2: Proposal).

4.  Project Timeline: Explain why you did or did not meet the timeframes set for your project.

5.  Project Development: Explain the development of your project and what your project actually accomplished by including some or all of the given points:

•   problems encountered and how they were solved

•   reasons for changes made to your original plan

•   unanticipated requirements or components that needed to be resolved

•   actual and potential effects of your project

•   conclusions about the success and effectiveness of your project

6.  Evidence of Project Deliverables: Include evidence (e.g., discussion, artifacts, and examples) of key project deliverables that will document and explain your project development. Possible deliverables are as follows:

•   code samples or screen shots

•   flowcharts, UML, or other process diagrams

•   charts, tables, and graphs

•   network diagrams (before and after)

•   training material

•   technical IT product itself
 

C.  When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.
 

Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.

ENT1 Task 2 0215

 

value: 0.00

value: 1.00

value: 2.00

value: 3.00

value: 4.00

Score/Level

Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.

The candidate provides weak articulation of response.

The candidate provides limited articulation of response.

The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.

The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

 

A. Topic

The candidate does not identify a topic for the project that aligns with the candidate’s degree program.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate identifies a topic for the project that aligns with the candidate’s degree program.

 

B1. Cover Sheet

The candidate does not provide a cover sheet for the project that includes the given elements.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate provides a cover sheet for the project that includes some of the given elements.

The candidate provides a cover sheet for the project that includes all of the given elements.

 

B2. Introduction

The candidate does not provide a logical overview of the actual development of the project.

The candidate provides a logical overview, with no detail, of the actual development of the project.

The candidate provides a logical overview, with limited detail, of the actual development of the project.

The candidate provides a logical overview, with adequate detail, of the actual development of the project.

The candidate provides a logical overview, with substantial detail, of the actual development of the project.

 

B2a. Description of Project

The candidate does not provide a precise description of the project.

The candidate provides a precise description of the project, with no detail.

The candidate provides a precise description of the project, with limited detail.

The candidate provides a precise description of the project, with adequate detail.

The candidate provides a precise description of the project, with substantial detail.

 

B2b. Review of Other Work

The candidate does not provide a thorough discussion of the review of other third-party work done on the chosen topic.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with no detail, of the review of other third-party work done on the chosen topic.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with limited detail, of the review of other third-party work done on the chosen topic.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with adequate detail, of the review of other third-party work done on the chosen topic.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with substantial detail, of the review of other third-party work done on the chosen topic.

 

B2c. Rationale

The candidate does not provide a thorough discussion of the rationale for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with no detail, of the rationale for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with limited detail, of the rationale for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with adequate detail, of the rationale for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with substantial detail, of the rationale for the project.

 

B2d. Systems Analysis and Methodology

The candidate does not provide a thorough discussion of the systems analysis and methodology for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with no detail, of the systems analysis and methodology for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with limited detail, of the systems analysis and methodology for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with adequate detail, of the systems analysis and methodology for the project.

The candidate provides a thorough discussion, with substantial detail, of the systems analysis and methodology for the project.

 

B3. Project Goals and Objectives

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of why some of the goals and objectives set for the project were accomplished and others were not.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of why some of the goals and objectives set for the project were accomplished and others were not.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of why some of the goals and objectives set for the project were accomplished and others were not.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of why some of the goals and objectives set for the project were accomplished and others were not.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of why some of the goals and objectives set for the project were accomplished and others were not.

 

B3a. Goals and Objectives List

The candidate does not provide a list of the goals and objectives identified in the proposal.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate provides a list of the goals and objectives identified in the proposal.

 

B4. Project Timeline

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of why the timeframes set for the project were either met or not met.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of why the timeframes set for the project were either met or not met.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of why the timeframes set for the project were either met or not met.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of why the timeframes set for the project were either met or not met.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of why the timeframes set for the project were either met or not met.

 

B5. Project Development

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the development of the project and what it actually accomplished, including some or all of the given points.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the development of the project and what it actually accomplished, including some or all of the given points.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the development of the project and what it actually accomplished, including some or all of the given points.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the development of the project and what it actually accomplished, including some or all of the given points.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the development of the project and what it actually accomplished, including some or all of the given points.

 

B6. Evidence of Project Deliverables

The candidate does not provide evidence of key project deliverables that will document and explain the project development.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate provides evidence of key project deliverables that will document and explain the project development.

 

C. Sources

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text
citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text
citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources,
the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources,
the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and
references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.

 

 

 

 

Answers

(12)
Status NEW Posted 10 Jul 2017 08:07 AM My Price 10.00

----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll

Not Rated(0)