The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 103 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 4870 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 4863 |
MBA IT, Mater in Science and Technology
Devry
Jul-1996 - Jul-2000
Professor
Devry University
Mar-2010 - Oct-2016
I need help with the following assignment. Also I have included the grading rubrick for which each section should be in the paper.Â
Â
Case Study 2: SCADA Worm
Due Week 6 and worth 100 points
Protecting the nation’s critical infrastructure is a major security challenge within the U.S.  Likewise, the responsibility for protecting the nation’s critical infrastructure encompasses all sectors of government, including private sector cooperation. Search on the Internet for information on the SCADA Worm, such as the article located at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/22/stuxnet_worm_weapon/.
Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Â
Â
2/7/2017 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/462/1128/Week6Â1128/Week 6 Case Study 2 Grading Rubric.html Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing
skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 100 Case Study 2: SCADA Worm Unacceptable Meets
Minimum
Expectations Fair Proficient Exemplary Below 60% F 60Â69% D 70Â79% C 80Â89% B 90Â100% A 1. Describe the
impact and the
vulnerability of the
SCADA / Stuxnet
worm on the
critical
infrastructure of
the United States.
Weight: 20% Did not submit or
incompletely
described the
impact and the
vulnerability of
the SCADA /
Stuxnet worm on
the critical
infrastructure of
the United
States. Insufficiently
described the
impact and the
vulnerability of
the SCADA /
Stuxnet worm
on the critical
infrastructure of
the United
States. Partially
described the
impact and the
vulnerability of
the SCADA /
Stuxnet worm
on the critical
infrastructure of
the United
States. Satisfactorily
described the
impact and the
vulnerability of
the SCADA /
Stuxnet worm
on the critical
infrastructure of
the United
States. Thoroughly
described the
impact and the
vulnerability of
the SCADA /
Stuxnet worm
on the critical
infrastructure of
the United
States. 2. Describe the
methods to
mitigate the
vulnerabilities, as
they relate to the
seven (7)
domains.
Weight: 20% Did not submit or
incompletely
described the
methods to
mitigate the
vulnerabilities, as
they relate to the
seven (7)
domains. Insufficiently
described the
methods to
mitigate the
vulnerabilities,
as they relate to
the seven (7)
domains. Partially
described the
methods to
mitigate the
vulnerabilities,
as they relate to
the seven (7)
domains. Satisfactorily
described the
methods to
mitigate the
vulnerabilities,
as they relate to
the seven (7)
domains. Thoroughly
described the
methods to
mitigate the
vulnerabilities,
as they relate to
the seven (7)
domains. 3. Assess the
levels of
responsibility
between
government
agencies and the
private sector for
mitigating threats
and vulnerabilities
to our critical
infrastructure.
Weight: 20% Did not submit or
incompletely
assessed the
levels of
responsibility
between
government
agencies and the
private sector for
mitigating threats
and
vulnerabilities to
our critical
infrastructure. Insufficiently
assessed the
levels of
responsibility
between
government
agencies and
the private
sector for
mitigating
threats and
vulnerabilities
to our critical
infrastructure. Partially
assessed the
levels of
responsibility
between
government
agencies and
the private
sector for
mitigating
threats and
vulnerabilities
to our critical
infrastructure. Satisfactorily
assessed the
levels of
responsibility
between
government
agencies and
the private
sector for
mitigating
threats and
vulnerabilities
to our critical
infrastructure. Thoroughly
assessed the
levels of
responsibility
between
government
agencies and
the private
sector for
mitigating
threats and
vulnerabilities
to our critical
infrastructure. 4. Assess the
elements of an
effective IT
Security Policy
Framework, and
how these
elements, if
properly
implemented,
could prevent or
mitigate and attack
similar to the
SCADA / Stuxnet
Worm.
Weight: 25% Did not submit or
incompletely
assessed the
elements of an
effective IT
Security Policy
Framework, and
how these
elements, if
properly
implemented,
could prevent or
mitigate and
attack similar to
the SCADA /
Stuxnet Worm. Insufficiently
assessed the
elements of an
effective IT
Security Policy
Framework, and
how these
elements, if
properly
implemented,
could prevent or
mitigate and
attack similar to
the SCADA /
Stuxnet Worm. Partially
assessed the
elements of an
effective IT
Security Policy
Framework, and
how these
elements, if
properly
implemented,
could prevent or
mitigate and
attack similar to
the SCADA /
Stuxnet Worm. Satisfactorily
assessed the
elements of an
effective IT
Security Policy
Framework,
and how these
elements, if
properly
implemented,
could prevent
or mitigate and
attack similar to
the SCADA /
Stuxnet Worm. Thoroughly
assessed the
elements of an
effective IT
Security Policy
Framework,
and how these
elements, if
properly
implemented,
could prevent
or mitigate and
attack similar to
the SCADA /
Stuxnet Worm. 5. 3 references
Weight: 5% No references
provided Does not meet
the required
number of
references; all
references poor
quality choices. Does not meet
the required
number of
references;
some Meets number
of required
references; all
references high
quality choices. Exceeds
number of
required
references; all
references high
quality choices. Criteria https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/462/1128/Week6Â1128/Week%206%20Case%20Study%202%20Grading%20Rubric.html 1/2 2/7/2017 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/462/1128/Week6Â1128/Week 6 Case Study 2 Grading Rubric.html references poor
quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing
mechanics, and
formatting
requirements
Weight: 10% More than 8
errors present 7Â8 errors
present 5Â6 errors
present 3Â4 errors
present 0Â2 errors
present https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/462/1128/Week6Â1128/Week%206%20Case%20Study%202%20Grading%20Rubric.html 2/2
-----------