Thinks for both only 50 words as much for each one

1-xxxxd, unfortunately there isn’t any Ethical Code of Conduct that all countries follow to the letter.  “When in Rome, you act as the Romans does.”  Therefore, Chiquita did what they thought was right under the circumstances.  Rather it was for profit or to save the lives of its employees.  Their decision may have been considered unethical by the United States standards.  But, to them it was the right thing to do to eliminate human causality.  A lot of these atrocities stem from the wide gap in wealth distribution, corruption, and greed at the highest level in the government infrastructure.  Not too long ago in the distant past in the United States, the government, politicians, influential business men and part of society partake in various atrocities as well against several groups of people all in the name of greed, profit, and racism.  At the time, they felt their actions was justified, and continued the course without deviation. 

2-I enjoyed reading your response to question 6 on the civil death policy legal terminology persay.  It helped me to understand more clearly that they would be denied rights such as voting, holding public office etc.  It is truly not a black or white answer, but a very gray area.  I know in some instances yes I could see businesses get that but due to the circumstances they were truly put into a no win situation.  Even if they went to the authorities they would probably have been found out and then they would end up still tortured and killed. 

this is about the chiquita case.