The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 327 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 12843 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 12834 |
MBA, Ph.D in Management
Harvard university
Feb-1997 - Aug-2003
Professor
Strayer University
Jan-2007 - Present
Hello there, Doctor.melody!
Â
Please help me with this assignment. Please ensure there are at least 4 sentences in a paragraph and always cite the resources (preferably within the past 5 years). I have included some References that you could possibly use from the course.
Â
Data Analysis
Â
Due Date: May 01, 2017 6pm   Max Points: 190
Â
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Directions:
Based on the data-collection procedures chosen in the Module 5 assignment, write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words explaining how you would analyze and report the data collected. Use language that can be understood by someone without training in statistics and research methods. The adequacy of your response depends on its technical correctness and its appropriateness to the intended audience. Do the following in your paper:
Â
References
Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 19(4), 99-104.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5-34.
Hendricks, M. (1981). Service delivery assessment: Qualitative evaluations at the cabinet level. In N. Smith (Ed.), New directions for program evaluation (No. 12, pp. 5-24).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McNamara, C. (n.d.). Basic guide to program evaluation. Retrieved from http://managementhelp.org/evaluation/program-evaluation-guide.htm
Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2010). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (4th ed.).Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1985). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., &; Padgett, D. K. (2016). Program evaluation: An introduction (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN-13:9781305101968
Sylvia, R. D., & Sylvia, K. M. (2004). Program evaluation and evaluation for the public manager (3rd ed.).Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Weathington, B. L., Cunningham, C. J. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral and social sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Attachments:
-----------