Miss Natalia

(14)

$20/per page/Negotiable

About Miss Natalia

Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University

Expertise:
Accounting,Business & Finance See all
Accounting,Business & Finance,Calculus,Computer Science,Environmental science,Health & Medical Hide all
Teaching Since: Apr 2017
Last Sign in: 360 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 6064
Tutorials Posted: 6070

Education

  • Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
    Phoniex University
    Oct-1999 - Nov-2005

Experience

  • HR Executive
    a21, Inc.
    Nov-1998 - Dec-2005

Category > Business & Finance Posted 05 May 2017 My Price 3.00

Discuss whether or not an inference is warranted

Assignment 2: Discussion—Comparison of Editorials

In this assignment, you will identify and explore your intuitive critical-thinking strategies. It is the starting point to developing the skills to analyze information critically.

Research methods of identifying strong and weak arguments using your textbook and the Argosy University online library resources. Be sure to cover the following:

  • Identify premises and conclusions
  • Discuss whether or not an inference is warranted
  • Determine whether arguments utilize inductive or deductive reasoning

For this assignment, your facilitator will assign you one of the following debates:

  • Debate 1: Should the “Ashley X” treatments have been permitted?
  • Debate 2: Is Osama Bin Laden’s death a decisive blow to Al Qaeda or an unmitigated victory against terrorism?

Each debate has two sets of articles for review. Your facilitator will assign you one of these sets.

Each set has two articles with two varying, but important, perspectives on the same subject. Be sure to read both articles in the set.

Debate 1:

These pairs of articles focus on the subject of “Ashley X,” a child with static encephalopathy who underwent radical surgical procedures to facilitate her care and, thereby, ostensibly improve her quality of life.

Set A

Set B

Debate 2

These pairs of articles focus on the subject of Osama Bin Laden’s death and the alleged implications his death are expected to have on matters of future Al Qaeda activity and international safety.

Set A

Set B

Respond to the following:

  • Identify and explain the strongest argument in each article.

Or

  • Identify and explain the weakest argument in each article.

Give reasons and examples from your research in support of your response.

Your initial response should be about 300–400 words in length, with at least one reference cited in APA format.

 

Answers

Miss Natalia
(14)
Status NEW Posted 05 May 2017 03:05 AM My Price 3.00

Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------

Not Rated(0)