The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 359 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 6064 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 6070 |
Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
Phoniex University
Oct-1999 - Nov-2005
HR Executive
a21, Inc.
Nov-1998 - Dec-2005
Please provide answers to the following three exercises/questions.
Â
1. Please provide a natural deduction proof for the following valid, deductive argument:
Premise 1: Â ~ ( F & A )
Premise 2: Â ~ ( L v ~ A )
Premise 3: Â D > ( F v L ) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â / ~ D
Â
2. Answer the following question: Â can one invalidity with the natural deduction proof method? Â Why or why not?
3. Answer the following the question: Â can one construct a natural deduction proof for an invalid argument in SL? Â Why or why not?
Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------