Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 189 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago |
Questions Answered: | 27237 |
Tutorials Posted: | 27372 |
MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
Devry University
Sep-2004 - Aug-2010
Assistant Financial Analyst
NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
Aug-2007 - Jul-2017
Revise the paper you wrote for me. Here is my professor 's comments: "This is good, but not quite what I was looking for. What you've done is made an argument for how systemic liberal peace is achieved. What I was looking for was a synthesis of the research debate, not so much whether one factor explains peace better. I've attached an example for you to look at and to help you."
Accuracy of content – 3/5 -- that your understanding of the key theoretical and conceptual ideas was accurate. • Rhetorically strong writing – 3/5 – a) that you had a thesis, a middle section of the paper that related to the thesis, that your conclusions linked to your thesis; and, b) that you followed my directions by synthesizing the four articles, focusing your literature review around 1-3 points, and that you offered concrete reasoning and plans for next steps in this line of research inquiry.
My professor provides a good example and I have attached it.
Â
Attachments:----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll