Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 246 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago |
Questions Answered: | 19234 |
Tutorials Posted: | 19224 |
MBA (IT), PHD
Kaplan University
Apr-2009 - Mar-2014
Professor
University of Santo Tomas
Aug-2006 - Present
Student Committee Report Grading Rubric
Each student will receive an individual grade for each committee report based upon thecategories below. Grades will be accumulated and averaged for the course committee grade.Assessment marks: √ = expected level; √+ = above expected level; √- =below expected levelCategory One: Did the student accurately represent the philosophical point in his or herpresentation?Category Two: Did the student advance the logical investigation of some aspect of thephilosophical point in a “pro” or “con” evaluative stance?Category Three: Did the student connect the abstract philosophical point to some events in thecontemporary world in which the student lives?Grade:Comments:
----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll