The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Jul 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 304 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 15833 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 15827 |
MBA,PHD, Juris Doctor
Strayer,Devery,Harvard University
Mar-1995 - Mar-2002
Manager Planning
WalMart
Mar-2001 - Feb-2009
Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 6
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from a list located in Course Resources. There is a choice of articles from which you must choose ONE to complete this assignment.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:
CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO #7)
CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and 8)
CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs #4 and 8)
CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs #7 and 8)
Points
The assignment is worth a total of 175 points.
Due Date
You are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.
Requirements
Through this assignment, the student will:
1. Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)
2. Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).
Guidelines to writing the Paper
1. Course Resources lists articles from which you are to select ONE to analyze.
2. Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly.
4. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.
5. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.
a. Discuss the research design of the study.
b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.
c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words
6. Describe the sample.
a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study
b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.
c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.
d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.
e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
7. Describe the data collection method(s)’
a. Who collected the data?
b. What tools were used?
c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.
d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
8. Describe the limitations of the study.
a. Identify the limitations within the study
b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies
c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study
d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
9. Describe the findings reported in the study.
a. Describe the findings reported in the study
b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study
c. Discuss the credibility of the findings
d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?
e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
10. Summary
11. Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source.
Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
Research Question
20
11%
Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words.
Design of Study
20
11%
Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words.
Sample/Population of the Study
25
14%
Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words.
Data Collection Methods
25
14%
Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words.
Limitations
20
12%
Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words.
Findings
20
12%
Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words.
Summary of Article
(See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.)
25
14%
Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss the probability of implementation into practice.
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting
20
12%
No more than 0–3 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
APA formatting is correct with 0–3 errors.
Total
175
100%
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
A (100%)
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance
B (88%)
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance
C (80%)
Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
NI (38%)
Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance
F (0%)
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance
Research question
20 points
Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the research question in detail
20 points ☐
Generally, describes, and analyzes the research question
18 points ☐
Briefly summarizes the research question, but omits some aspects of the question.
16 points ☐
Incorrectly describes the research question.
8 points ☐
Does not describe the research question.
0 points ☐
Design of the study
20 points
Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the design of the study in detail.
20 points ☐
Generally, describes, and analyzes the design of the study.
18 points ☐
Briefly summarizes the design of the study, but omits some aspects of the design.
16 points ☐
Incorrectly describes the design of the study.
8 points ☐
Does not describe the design of the study
0 points ☐
Sample/ population of the study
25 points
Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the sample used in the study in detail.
25 points ☐
Generally, describes, and analyzes the sample used in the study.
22 points ☐
Briefly summarizes the sample used in the study, but omits some details.
20 points ☐
Incorrectly describes the sample in the study, or omits major details.
10 points ☐
Does not describe the sample used in the study.
0 points ☐
Data collection methods
25 points
Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes all of the data collection methods used in the study.
25 points ☐
Generally, describes, and analyzes the majority of data collection methods used in the study.
22 points ☐
Briefly summarizes and describes parts of the data collection method used in the study.
20 points ☐
Incorrectly describes the data collection method used in the study.
10 points ☐
Does not describe the data collection method used in the study.
0 points ☐
Limitations
20 points
Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the limitations found in the study in detail.
20 points ☐
Generally, describes, and analyzes the limitations found in the study.
18 points ☐
Briefly summarizes the limitations found in the study.
16 points ☐
Incorrectly describes the limitations found in the study.
8 points ☐
Does not describe the limitations found in the study.
0 points ☐
Findings
20 points
Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the findings of the study in detail.
20 points ☐
Generally, describes, and analyzes the findings of the study.
18 points ☐
Briefly summarizes the findings of the study.
16 points ☐
Incorrectly identifies the findings from the study.
8 points ☐
Does not describe the findings of the study.
0 points ☐
Summary
25 points
Summarizes study in detail and states specific rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted
25 points ☐
Generally, summarizes study. Gives broad rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.
22 points ☐
Briefly summarizes study and states rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.
20 points ☐
Minimally summarizes study.
Gives poor rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.
10 points ☐
Does not summarize study and does not give rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.
0 points ☐
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling/ APA formatting
20 points
No errors in grammar, punctuation, APA, and spelling.
20 points ☐
One to four errors in grammar, spelling,
18 points ☐
Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax
16 points ☐
Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.
8 points ☐
Thirteen or more errors to the point where it is difficult to understand the meaning of the student’s writing.
0 points ☐
Total Points Possible = 175 points
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k y-----------ou -----------for----------- yo-----------ur -----------int-----------ere-----------st -----------and----------- bu-----------yin-----------g m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l b-----------e q-----------uic-----------kly-----------