The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Jul 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 304 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 15833 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 15827 |
MBA,PHD, Juris Doctor
Strayer,Devery,Harvard University
Mar-1995 - Mar-2002
Manager Planning
WalMart
Mar-2001 - Feb-2009
Need a paper on how electronic health records improve quality of inpatient nursing care. Needs to be 4 to 6 pages
NR512
HealthIT Hot Topic of Week Assignment
Guidelineswith Scoring Rubric
Purpose
This assignment is designed to help students
· Develop an appreciation for informatics, basic skills and knowledge required in practice settings.Students will select a “hot” topic of particular interest to their practice to discuss.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the following ability.
(CO3) Analyze ethical and legal concerns related to nursing informatics while using, designing, managing, and upgrading information systems. (POs 4, 6)
(CO 6) Describe health information systems within healthcare setting and the profession of nursing in all practice domains and settings including electronic health records (EHR), their management and patient-care information technology (IT). (PO 4)
(CO 7) ExploretrendsandissuesinNIandtheirimpactonnursingpracticeinall domains.(POs9,11)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.
Total Points Possible: 200
Requirements
Visit the FierceEMR or FierceHealthIT websites and select 1 of 5 “hot” topics of the week that may impact your practice. In a professionally developed paper, discuss the rationale for choosing the topic, how it will impact practice in a positive or negative manner, citing pros and cons. Include a discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. In the conclusion, provide recommendations for the future.
1. The HealthIT Hot Topic of the Week must be a professional, scholarly prepared paper. See the guidelines for writing a professional, scholarly paper in the Course Resources. The professional paper will have an introduction, the body of paper to explain what you are doing, a summary/conclusion, and at least three scholarly references.
2 Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside of course readings.
3. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition.
4. The paper (excluding the title page, introduction and reference page) is 4-6 pages in length.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing.
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Introduction |
10 |
5 |
Introduction presents a brief overview of the parts of the paper. |
|
Selects relevant HealthIT hot topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic |
70 |
35 |
Provides convincing rationale for topic selection |
|
Convincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner citing pros and cons. Include discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment |
90 |
45 |
Convincing arguments of how topic impacts practice in a positive or negative manner; pros and cons are presented; discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process to develop the assignment |
|
Conclusion |
10 |
5 |
Concluding statements summarize insights about the key elements of the paper gained during the assignment. Recommendations for the future are provided |
|
APA Style |
6 |
3 |
Text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
|
Citations |
7 |
3.5 |
Ideas and information from sources are cited correctly. There are a minimum of three scholarly, current (5 years or less) references. |
|
Writing Mechanics |
7 |
3.5 |
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work,. |
|
Total |
200 |
100% |
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance |
Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
|
ContentPossible Points = 200 Points |
|||||
|
Introduction |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
7 Points |
0 Points |
|
Introduction presents a brief overview all parts of the paper. |
Introduction presents one of the two required elements. |
Introduction does not include either of the two required elements. |
Minimal attempt at introduction. |
No introduction is present.
|
|
|
Selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic |
70 Points |
64 Points |
60 Points |
55 Points |
0 Points |
|
Successfully selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic |
Selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic. |
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic. |
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides no rationale for selecting topic. |
Does not complete assignment. |
|
|
Convincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner citing pros and cons. Discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment |
90 Points |
85 Points |
78 Points |
70 Points |
0 Points |
|
Convincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons not presented. Discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. |
Arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons not presented. Some discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. |
Minimal arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons not presented. Some discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used. |
Minimal arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons not presented. No discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used. |
Minimal discussion of topic, impact – no discussion of relevance to informatics skills or knowledge. |
|
|
Conclusion |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
7 Points |
0 Points |
|
Concluding statements summarize insights about the key elements of the paper gained during the assignment. Recommendations for the future are provided. |
Provides a summary of key points and a partial summary of insights gained during the assignment. |
Concluding statements are present but do not address insights.
|
Minimal concluding statement. |
No conclusion.
|
|
|
Content Subtotal_____/180 Points |
|||||
|
Format Possible Points = 20 Points |
|||||
|
APA Style |
6 Points |
5 Points |
4 Points |
2 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–1 APA format errors in text, title, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
2-3 APA format errors in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
4-6 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
7-9 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
10 or more APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
|
|
Citations |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points |
3 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–1 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited correctly. There are a minimum of three scholarly, current (5 years or less) references. |
2-3 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
4-6 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
7-9 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
10 or more errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
|
|
Writing Mechanics |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points |
3 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–3 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing. |
4–6 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing.
|
7–9 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing. . |
7–9 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing.
|
10 or more errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing. |
|
|
Format Subtotal_____/20 Points |
|||||
|
Total Points____/200 Points |
|||||
----------- ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------you-----------r i-----------nte-----------res-----------t a-----------nd -----------buy-----------ing----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------n. -----------Ple-----------ase----------- pi-----------ng -----------me -----------on -----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be----------- qu-----------ick-----------ly