CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 221 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Psychology Posted 13 Oct 2017 My Price 10.00

analyze the reasoning

Hi need help responding to these two discussion post

Guided Response: Read the arguments presented by your classmates, and analyze the reasoning that they have presented. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.

 

Week 2 Discussion 2

Rolland Mattoon

2/16/2017 5:25:43 PM

18. Julie is allergic to gluten. So, she won’t be having any bread.

P1: Julie is allergic to gluten

P2: If Julie eats gluten she would have an allergic reaction

P3: 2 Bread has gluten

C: Therefore, since Julie is allergic to gluten and she would have an allergic reaction if she ate gluten then she won’t be eating the bread.

This is a valid argument since all the premises are facts. Since Julie is allergic she will not be able to eat the bread that contains gluten.

W2 Discussion 2 - Deductive Logic

Christopher Ponce

2/16/2017 8:10:56 AM

28- If the maid was guilty then she would have had to been at the scene during the crime. However, she was seen a mile away only minutes before the crime, and she has no car. She must be innocent.

P1- The maid has an alibi.

P2- The maid was a mile away, only minutes, before the crime was committed.

P3- She has no car.

P4- Without a car the maid could not have been at the scene quickly enough to commit the crime, even other means of transportation take longer than a few minutes like a bus or taxi.

C- The Maid is innocent

Logically speaking, whoever committed the crime had to be on scene. The Premises validly link to the conclusion because they show that the maid could not have been at the scene quickly enough to commit the crime. Therefore she couldn’t have committed the crime making her innocent. The best way to strengthen this argument would be by having more facts. In scenarios like this, there could be a lot of what if questions. For example, what if the maid was seen a mile away in a car she borrowed from a friend? Or what if the crime was setting off a bomb? In which she could have done from a mile away.

 

Answers

CourseLover
(12)
Status NEW Posted 13 Oct 2017 05:10 PM My Price 10.00

----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll

Not Rated(0)
Relevent Questions