The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Jul 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 314 Weeks Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 15833 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 15827 |
MBA,PHD, Juris Doctor
Strayer,Devery,Harvard University
Mar-1995 - Mar-2002
Manager Planning
WalMart
Mar-2001 - Feb-2009
I need someone to check attached Network Proposal draft and provide recommendations based on profesor's fedback.
Rubric Part 1
| Â |
 |
||
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
 |
|
Assessed the appropriate vulnerability assessment tools to support the requirements of the organization |
Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the vulnerability assessment. |
 |
 |
|
Identified the appropriate security policy for the organization |
Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the security policy. |
 |
 |
|
Describe the proper risk management solution to reduce risk to an acceptable level |
Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the proper risk management solution. |
 |
 |
|
Assessed the appropriate business continuity plan to enable critical organizational functions to continue |
Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the business continuity plan. |
 |
 |
|
Assessed the proper access control models for the organization |
 |
Provided an outstanding description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the access control model(s) selected. |
 |
|
Use of Authoritative Sources / Resources |
 |
Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited sources. One or two minor errors in IEEE format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. The description appropriately used information from 4 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites. |
 |
|
Satisfy standards of writing style and grammatical correctness |
 |
Work contains minor errors in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. |
 |
|
Overall Score |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
 |
| Â |
|
 | |
Â
----------- Â ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------you-----------r i-----------nte-----------res-----------t a-----------nd -----------buy-----------ing----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------n. -----------Ple-----------ase----------- pi-----------ng -----------me -----------on -----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be----------- qu-----------ick-----------ly