Maurice Tutor

(5)

$15/per page/Negotiable

About Maurice Tutor

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Biology,Calculus,Chemistry,Economics,English,Essay writing,Geography,Geology,Health & Medical,Physics,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 409 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago
Questions Answered: 66690
Tutorials Posted: 66688

Education

  • MCS,PHD
    Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
    Nov-2005 - Oct-2011

Experience

  • Professor
    Phoniex University
    Oct-2001 - Nov-2016

Category > Management Posted 06 Nov 2017 My Price 8.00

Calvert Social Balanced Fund

Expand Your Knowledge: Moving Averages You do not need a lot of money to invest in a mutual fund. However, if you decide to put some money into an investment, you are usually advised to leave it in for (at least) several years. Why? Because good years tend to cancel out bad years, giving you a better overall return with less risk. To see what we mean, let’s use a 3-year moving average on the Calvert Social Balanced Fund (a socially responsible fund).

Year

1990      

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

% Return

1.78

17.79

7.46

5.95

 

-4.74

 

25.85

 

9.03

 

18.92

17.49

 

6.80

-2.38

(a) Use a calculator with mean and standard deviation keys to verify that the mean annual return for all 11 years is approximately 9.45%, with standard deviation 9.57%.

(b) To compute a 3-year moving average for 1992, we take the data values for 1992 and the prior two years and average them. To compute a 3-year moving average for 1993, we take the data values for 1993 and the prior two years and average them. Verify that the following 3-year moving averages are correct.

Year

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

3-year moving average

9.01

10.4

2.89

9.02

10.05

17.93

15.15

14.4

7.3

(c) Use a calculator with mean and standard deviation keys to verify that for the 3-year moving average, the mean is 10.68% with sample standard deviation 4.53%.

(d) Interpretation Compare the results of parts (a) and (c). Suppose we take the point of view that risk is measured by standard deviation. Is the risk (standard deviation) of the 3-year moving average considerably smaller?

 

Answers

(5)
Status NEW Posted 06 Nov 2017 07:11 PM My Price 8.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------

Not Rated(0)