The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 407 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
Supronics Corp., a manufacturer of ordinary types of lipsticks and nail polish, agreed to sell Hillmor Sales a small quantity of nail polish and lipsticks at close-out prices. Supronics then “pulled” the order so as to combine it with a larger shipment to another larger retailer. Hillmore demanded that Supronics go through with the contract and deliver the goods requested based on the remedy of specific performance— that the merchandise was unique and purchased at close-out prices. Was specific performance a proper remedy? (Part 1, NY Law Journal, 6 UCC Rept. Serv. 325)
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------