The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 432 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
This exercise looks into the relationship between clauses and implication sentences.
a. Show that the clause (7P1 V . . . V TP, V Q) is logically equivalent to the implication sentence (PI A . A P,) + Q.
b. Show that every clause (regardless of the number of positive literals) can be written in the form (PI A . . . A P,) + (Q1 V . - . V Q,), where the Ps and Qs are proposition symbols. A knowledge base consisting of such sentences is in implicative normal IMPLICATIVE NORMAL FORM form or Kowalski form.
c. Write down the full resolution rule for sentences in implicative normal form.
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------