The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 408 Weeks Ago, 3 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
Mr. and Mrs. Volkman entered into a contract with DP Associates for construction advice on building a house. They brought suit, claiming a breach of contract. The principals of DP Associates claimed they were not partners and that no partnership existed. The evidence was that the Volkmans met both individuals at the company office and discussed the construction with them, received correspondence from them on stationary marked “DP Associates,” and were assured that both individuals would be working on the Volkman’s job. Was the evidence sufficient to support a finding that an implied partnership existed? (Volkman v. DP Associates, 268 S.E.2d 265)
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------