The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 407 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
The Haffs were sole shareholders of a restaurant supply wholesale business that often bought supplies from Cosgrove. When Haff ceased operations, it owed Cosgrove $9,000.
Cosgrove sued the Haffs personally for the amount owed, contending that the corporate veil should be pierced. The two companies had done business for ten years. Cosgrove testified that it did not know what legal form Haff had. The phone was answered "J. Haff." The invoices sent from Cosgrove were made out to "J. A. Haff and Sons, Inc." Checks came from "J. A. Haff and Sons." The evidence was that Haff followed proper corporate procedures for annual meetings and separate accounts. Was the veil to be pierced? [Cosgrove Distributors, Inc. v. Haff, 798 N.E.2d 139, App. Ct, Ill. (2003)]
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------