Alpha Geek

(8)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About Alpha Geek

Levels Tought:
University

Expertise:
Accounting,Algebra See all
Accounting,Algebra,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Communications,Computer Science,Environmental science,Essay writing,Programming,Social Science,Statistics Hide all
Teaching Since: Apr 2017
Last Sign in: 442 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 9562
Tutorials Posted: 9559

Education

  • bachelor in business administration
    Polytechnic State University Sanluis
    Jan-2006 - Nov-2010

  • CPA
    Polytechnic State University
    Jan-2012 - Nov-2016

Experience

  • Professor
    Harvard Square Academy (HS2)
    Mar-2012 - Present

Category > Accounting Posted 19 May 2017 My Price 15.00

Evaluating managers, ROI, value-chain analysis of cost structure

*19.19 Evaluating managers, ROI, value-chain analysis of cost structure. (40–50 minutes)

User Friendly Computer is one of the largest personal computer companies in the world. The board of directors was recently (March 2008) informed that User Friendly’s president, Felix Lechat, was resigning to ‘pursue other interests’. An executive search firm recommends that the board consider appointing Peter Diamond (current CEO of Computer Power) or Rachida Kamel (current CEO of Plum Computer). You collect the following financial information on Computer Power and Plum Computer for 2006 and 2007 (in  millions):

 

 

Computer Power                     Plum Computer

––––––––––––––––––––            ––––––––––––––––––––

2006                   2007                 2006                 2007

 

Total assets                            €360.0                 €340.0             €160.0              €240.0

––––––––––––––                ––––––––––––––            ––––––––––––––             ––––––––––––

Revenues                               €400.0                 €320.0             €200.0              €350.0

–––––––                        –––––––                   –––––––                    –––––––

Costs

R&D                                       36.0                     16.8                 18.0                   43.5

Design                                   15.0                       8.4                   3.6                   11.6

Production                          102.0                   112.0                 82.8                   98.6

Marketing                             75.0                     92.4                 36.0                   66.7

Distribution                          27.0                     22.4                 18.0                   23.2

Customer service                 45.0                     28.0                 21.6                   46.4

–––––––                        –––––––                   –––––––                    ––––––– Total costs        300.0                                                     280.0                180.0                                        290.0

–––––––                        –––––––                   –––––––                    –––––––

Operating profit                   €100.0                   €40.0               €20.0                €60.0

 

––––––––––––––

 

––––––––––––––

 

––––––––––––––

 

––––––––––––––

 

 

In early 2008, a computer magazine gave Plum Computer’s main product five stars (its highest rating on a five-point scale). Computer Power’s main product was given three stars, down from five stars a year ago because of customer-service problems. The computer maga- zine also ran an article on new-product introductions in the personal computer industry. Plum Computer received high marks for new products in 2007. Computer Power’s perform- ance was called ‘mediocre’. One ‘unnamed insider’ of Computer Power commented: ‘Our new-product cupboard is empty.’

 

Required

1    Use the DuPont method to analyse the ROI of Computer Power and Plum Computer in 2006 and 2007. Comment on the   results.

2    Calculate the percentage of costs in each of the six business-function cost categories for Computer Power and Plum Computer in 2006 and 2007. Comment on the   results.

3    Rank Diamond and Kamel as potential candidates for CEO of User Friendly Computer.

 

Answers

(8)
Status NEW Posted 19 May 2017 03:05 PM My Price 15.00

-----------

Attachments

file 1495206657-1397052_1_636306733366478311_ROI-evaluation.xlsx preview (492 words )
13-----------970-----------52&-----------amp-----------;am-----------p;i-----------nfo-----------Id=-----------491-----------827-----------*19-----------.19----------- E-----------val-----------uat-----------ing----------- ma-----------nag-----------ers-----------, R-----------OI,----------- va-----------lue------------ch-----------ain----------- an-----------aly-----------sis----------- of----------- co-----------st -----------str-----------uct-----------ure-----------. -----------(40-----------–-----------50 -----------min-----------ute-----------s)U-----------ser----------- Fr-----------ien-----------dly----------- Co-----------mpu-----------ter----------- is----------- on-----------e o-----------f t-----------he -----------lar-----------ges-----------t p-----------ers-----------ona-----------l c-----------omp-----------ute-----------r c-----------omp-----------ani-----------es -----------in -----------the----------- wo-----------rld-----------. T-----------he -----------boa-----------rd -----------of -----------dir-----------ect-----------ors----------- wa-----------s r-----------ece-----------ntl-----------y (-----------Mar-----------ch -----------200-----------8) -----------inf-----------orm-----------ed -----------tha-----------t U-----------ser----------- Fr-----------ien-----------dly-----------’-----------s p-----------res-----------ide-----------nt,----------- Fe-----------lix----------- Le-----------cha-----------t, -----------was----------- re-----------sig-----------nin-----------g t-----------o â-----------€˜p-----------urs-----------ue -----------oth-----------er -----------int-----------ere-----------sts-----------’-----------. A-----------n e-----------xec-----------uti-----------ve -----------sea-----------rch----------- fi-----------rm -----------rec-----------omm-----------end-----------s t-----------hat----------- th-----------e b-----------oar-----------d c-----------ons-----------ide-----------r a-----------ppo-----------int-----------ing-----------
Not Rated(0)