Maurice Tutor

(5)

$15/per page/Negotiable

About Maurice Tutor

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Biology,Calculus,Chemistry,Economics,English,Essay writing,Geography,Geology,Health & Medical,Physics,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 408 Weeks Ago
Questions Answered: 66690
Tutorials Posted: 66688

Education

  • MCS,PHD
    Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
    Nov-2005 - Oct-2011

Experience

  • Professor
    Phoniex University
    Oct-2001 - Nov-2016

Category > Management Posted 22 Jan 2018 My Price 4.00

second politician’s argument

Consider the same highway paving project from question 8. A second politician says to you, “At an interest rate of 6%, the project is a bad idea. Over ten years, the project reduces maintenance costs by a total of $3 billion. But borrowing $2 billion for ten years at a 6% interest rate means paying $1.58 billion in interest. The total cost of the project over ten years in therefore $3.58 billion!” Use present value calculations to show that the project is, in fact, worth undertaking at a 6% interest rate. What’s wrong with the second politician’s argument?

 

Answers

Maurice Tutor
(5)
Status NEW Posted 22 Jan 2018 08:01 PM My Price 4.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------

Not Rated(0)