The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 398 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
Adam asks Bruce, a tyre dealer, to supply tyres for his four wheel drive truck. Bruce shows Adam a set of tyres and quotes a price of $1,200. Adam purchases the tyres. The invoice merely sets out the name and the price of the tyres. Later, Adam discovers that these tyres are not safe for off-road work and claims that he is the victim of a breach of contract. Is Adam correct?
(A) No, as there was no express undertaking by Bruce that the tyres would be safe for off-road work.
(B) No, because Bruce is a supplier of tyres and he just sold Adam a set of tyres suitable for on and off-road use.
(C) Yes, Adam is correct as there was an implied term that the tyres should be suitable for off-road driving, and Bruce as a regular seller implied they were suitable.
(D) No, because apart from Adam just saying to Bruce he needs tyres for his fourwheel drive he should have double-checked them before leaving the tyre supplier.
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------