The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 407 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
L. B. Hare (Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 20, pp. 36–42, 1988) reported the use of a 25 − 1 design in an experiment for which the primary goal was to determine the effect of five factors on fill weight variation for a dry mix soup filling process. The largest effect estimate was the main effect estimate of factor E (3.76), and the largest two-factor interaction involving this factor was the BE interaction, for which the effect estimate was 3.24. This was the second largest effect.
Â
(a) How would you recommend that the influence of factor E be reported?
(b) What effect is the E effect confounded with, assuming that the design was constructed in an optimal manner? Should this confounding be of any concern?
(c) Similarly, what effect is the BE interaction confounded with and should that confounding be of any concern?
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------