The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 398 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
Stress rupture data are sometimes correlated with the Dorn parameter, θ = i exp[−Q/(RT)], where t is the rupture time, T is absolute temperature, and θ is assumed to depend only on stress. If this parameter correctly describes a set of data, then a plot of log(t) versus 1/T for data at a single level of stress would be a straight line. If the Larson-Miller parameter correctly correlates data, a plot of data at constant stress (therefore, constant PLM) of log(t) versus 1/T would also be a straight line.
Â
A. If both parameters predict straight lines on log(t) versus 1/T plots, are they really the same thing?
B. If not, how do they differ? How could you tell from a plot of log(t) versus (1/T) which parameter better correlates a set of stress rupture data?
Â
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on-----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be-----------