The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
University
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 438 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 9562 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 9559 |
bachelor in business administration
Polytechnic State University Sanluis
Jan-2006 - Nov-2010
CPA
Polytechnic State University
Jan-2012 - Nov-2016
Professor
Harvard Square Academy (HS2)
Mar-2012 - Present
Â
Balanced budget versus automatic stabilizers It is often argued that a balanced budget amendment would actually be destabilizing. To understand this argument, consider the economy in Problem 5.
a. Solve for equilibrium output.
b. Solve for taxes in equilibrium. Suppose that the government starts with a balanced budget and that there is a drop in c0.
c. What happens to Y? What happens to taxes?
d. Suppose that the government cuts spending in order to keep the budget balanced. What will be the effect on Y? Does the cut in spending required to balance the budget counteract or reinforce the effect of the drop in c0 on output? (Don’t do the algebra. Use your intuition and give the answer in words.)
Problem 5
Automatic stabilizers
So far in this chapter, we have assumed that the fiscal policy variables G and T are independent of the level of income. In the real world, however, this is not the case. Taxes typically depend on the level of income and so tend to be higher when income is higher. In this problem, we examine how this automatic response of taxes can help reduce the impact of changes in autonomous spending on output. Consider the following behavioral equations:
![]()
G and I are both constant. Assume that t1Â is between 0 and 1.
a. Solve for equilibrium output.
b. What is the multiplier? Does the economy respond more to changes in autonomous spending when t1Â is 0 or when t1Â is positive? Explain.
c. Why is fiscal policy in this case called an automatic stabilizer?
Â
Â
-----------