The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 283 Weeks Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 27237 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 27372 |
MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
Devry University
Sep-2004 - Aug-2010
Assistant Financial Analyst
NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
Aug-2007 - Jul-2017
Question description
Â
Bid with 10 hours Only
Assignment 2.3: Justification Report – Part 3 (Final)
Due Week 7 and worth 180 points
In Assignments 2.1 (Part 1) and 2.2 (Part 2) of the Justification Report, you built up the major parts of your formal, researched justification report (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, Methods, Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and References). For Part 3 you will begin by inserting your revisions of Parts 1 and 2 based on your instructor’s suggestions. Then, you will include a few new sections. Note: Some sections presented below are out of order so pay attention to where the section should go (for instance, the Transmittal should be the second page of your report based on the provided template). It is essential that you present the final report in the correct section order.
Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:
Using the provided template from Week 7, write Part 3 to complete a single-spaced report in which you:
Tiffany, my suggestions: (PROFESSOR SUGGESTIONS TO MY ATTACHED REPORT THAT NEED TO BE REFLECTED FOR PART 3)
I see that you've worked on the criteria. Good. However, cost could just be one factor, not three factors.
The 'Evaluation' is incomplete. You need to compare and contrast both your alternatives against each of the five criteria in detail so you can see where they are similar and where different. Please see sample for reference.
Since Evaluation is not complete, 'Findings' needs work as well. The chart does not show what are the criteria against which you're comparing the alternatives.
There are no references and in text citations. You need to give at least two good sources.
Attachments:
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l