Maurice Tutor

(5)

$15/per page/Negotiable

About Maurice Tutor

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Biology,Calculus,Chemistry,Economics,English,Essay writing,Geography,Geology,Health & Medical,Physics,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 409 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 66690
Tutorials Posted: 66688

Education

  • MCS,PHD
    Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
    Nov-2005 - Oct-2011

Experience

  • Professor
    Phoniex University
    Oct-2001 - Nov-2016

Category > Management Posted 11 Jun 2017 My Price 13.00

Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis

Assign 2, 2012(350) Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis? Cornia, P., Hersh, A., Lipsky, B., Newman, T., Gonzales, R.. (2010). Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(8), 890. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1181 Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis van de Beek, D., de Gans, J., Spanjaard, L., Weisfelt, M., Reitsma, J., & Vermeulen, M. (2004). Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis.Assign 2, 2012(350)

Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis?

Cornia, P., Hersh, A., Lipsky, B., Newman, T., Gonzales, R.. (2010). Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(8), 890. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1181

 

Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis

van de Beek, D., de Gans, J., Spanjaard, L., Weisfelt, M., Reitsma, J., & Vermeulen, M. (2004). Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(18), 1849. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040845

 

Read these two abstracts from the posted articles and comment on the quality of the abstract. Would you recommend publishing this article?

Now act is if you were the peer reviewer for this article and rate* the author on: 

Quality of writing and 

Support for the conclusion which has been reached. 

Comment on scores below a ranking of 4 and make a suggestion for improvement. 

What where the strengths of the paper? 

Any additional thoughts you have on how the article could have been presented better should be included. 

Comment on the title. Was it appropriate or misleading? 

 

 

Answers

(5)
Status NEW Posted 11 Jun 2017 11:06 AM My Price 13.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- Â-----------  -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll

Not Rated(0)