Levels Tought:
University
Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 344 Weeks Ago |
Questions Answered: | 9562 |
Tutorials Posted: | 9559 |
bachelor in business administration
Polytechnic State University Sanluis
Jan-2006 - Nov-2010
CPA
Polytechnic State University
Jan-2012 - Nov-2016
Professor
Harvard Square Academy (HS2)
Mar-2012 - Present
15.26Â Â Â Â Â Â Â What is a qualitative independent variable?
15.27Â Â Â Â Â Â Â How do we use dummy variables to model the effects of a qualitative independent variable?
15.28Â Â Â Â Â Â Â What does the parameter multiplied by a dummy variable express?
Â
METHODS AND APPLICATIONS
15.29       Neter, Kutner, Nachtsheim, and Wasserman (1996) relate the speed, y, with which a particular insurance innovation is adopted to the size of the insurance firm, x, and the type of firm. The dependent variable y is measured by the number of months elapsed between the time the first firm adopted the innovation and the time the firm being considered adopted the innovation. The size of the firm, x, is measured by the total assets of the firm, and the type of firm—a qualitative independent variable—is either a mutual company or a stock company. The data in Table 15.10
Â
Plot of the Insurance
on the next page are observed.
DSÂ InsInnov
a    Discuss why the data plot in the page margin indicates that the model
Â
y = b0 + b1x + b2DS + e
might appropriately describe the observed data. Here DS equals 1 if the firm is a stock company and 0 if the firm is a mutual company.
b    The model of part a implies that the mean adoption time of an insurance innovation by mutual companies having an asset size x equals
Â
b0 + b1x + b2(0) = b0 + b1x
Innovation Data
Firm 1 |
y 17 |
x 151 |
of Firm Mutual |
Firm 11 |
y 28 |
x 164 |
of Firm Stock |
2 |
26 |
92 |
Mutual |
12 |
15 |
272 |
Stock |
3 |
21 |
175 |
Mutual |
13 |
11 |
295 |
Stock |
4 |
30 |
31 |
Mutual |
14 |
38 |
68 |
Stock |
5 |
22 |
104 |
Mutual |
15 |
31 |
85 |
Stock |
6 |
0 |
277 |
Mutual |
16 |
21 |
224 |
Stock |
7 |
12 |
210 |
Mutual |
17 |
20 |
166 |
Stock |
8 |
19 |
120 |
Mutual |
18 |
13 |
305 |
Stock |
9 |
4 |
290 |
Mutual |
19 |
30 |
124 |
Stock |
10 |
16 |
238 |
Mutual |
20 |
14 |
246 |
Stock |
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
ANOVA Regression |
df 2 |
SS 1,504.4133 |
MS 752.2067 |
F 72.4971 |
Significance F 4.77E-09 |
 |
Residual |
17 |
176.3867 |
10.3757 |
 |
 |
|
Total |
19 |
1,680.8 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Coefficients |
Standard Error |
t Stat |
P-value |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
Intercept |
33.8741 |
1.8139 |
18.6751 |
9.15E-13 |
30.0472 |
37.7010 |
Size of Firm (x) |
-0.1017 |
0.0089 |
-11.4430 |
2.07E-09 |
-0.1205 |
-0.0830 |
DummyStock |
8.0555 |
1.4591 |
5.5208 |
3.74E-05 |
4.9770 |
11.1339 |
and that the mean adoption time by stock companies having an asset size x equals
b0 + b1x + b2(1) = b0 + b1x + b2
The difference between these two means equals the model parameter b2. In your own words, interpret the practical meaning of b2.
c    Figure 15.18 presents the Excel output of a regression analysis of the insurance innovation data using the model of part a. (1) Using the output, test H0: b2 = 0 versus Ha: b2 * 0 by set- ting a = .05 and .01. (2) Interpret the practical meaning of the result of this test. (3) Also, use the computer output to find, report, and interpret a 95 percent confidence interval for b2.
d   If we add the interaction term xDS to the model of part a, we find that the p-value related to this term is .9821. What does this imply?
Â
-----------