Maurice Tutor

(5)

$15/per page/Negotiable

About Maurice Tutor

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Biology,Calculus,Chemistry,Economics,English,Essay writing,Geography,Geology,Health & Medical,Physics,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 398 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago
Questions Answered: 66690
Tutorials Posted: 66688

Education

  • MCS,PHD
    Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
    Nov-2005 - Oct-2011

Experience

  • Professor
    Phoniex University
    Oct-2001 - Nov-2016

Category > Management Posted 06 Jul 2017 My Price 12.00

well-insulated continuous reactor

Ammonia is oxidized in a well-insulated continuous reactor: 4 NH3 (g) + 5 O2 (g) ? 4 NO (g) + 6 H2O (v): ?H°? = – 904.7 kJ/mol The feed stream enters at 200°C and the products leave at temperature T out (°C). The inlet—outlet enthalpy table for the reactor appears as follows:
(a) Draw and label a process flowchart and calculate the molar amounts of the product stream components and the extent of reaction, ? (mol/s). Fill in the values of n3, n4, and n5 on the enthalpy table.
(b) The energy balance for this reactor reduces to ?H ˜ 0. Summarize the assumptions that must be made to obtain this result.
(c) Calculate the values of H1 and H2 and write expressions for H3, H4, and H5 in terms of the outlet temperature. T out Then calculate T out from the energy balance, using either a spreadsheet or a programmable calculator. (See Example 9.5-3)
(d) A design engineer obtained a preliminary estimate of the reactor outlet temperature using only the first terms of the heat capacity formulas in Table B.2. [For example, (Cp) NH3 ˜ 0.03515 kJ / (mol·°C).j what value did she calculate? Taking the result of part (c) to be correct, determine the percentage error in T out that results from using the one-term heat capacity formulas.
(e) The preliminary estimate of T01 was mistakenly used as the basis of the design and construction of the reactor. Was this a dangerous error from the standpoint of reactor safety or did it in fact lower the hazard potential? Explain.


 

 

Answers

(5)
Status NEW Posted 06 Jul 2017 08:07 PM My Price 12.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- Â-----------  -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll

Not Rated(0)