The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Jul 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 304 Weeks Ago, 3 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 15833 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 15827 |
MBA,PHD, Juris Doctor
Strayer,Devery,Harvard University
Mar-1995 - Mar-2002
Manager Planning
WalMart
Mar-2001 - Feb-2009
The professor asked this question:
Â
Then, provide a summary of the case, including key issues and your thoughts on the ruling of the court case (i.e. do you agree/disagree with the outcome and why/why not?) must be APA format. Include APA citation. Use at least 2 references. Should be at least 300 words.
Â
So i found a case about whistle blowing called Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville on this website: http://www.hilderlaw.com/Publications/What-Retaliation-US-Supreme-Court-Expands-Anti-Retaliation-Rules.pdf. (this is just 1 reference, please find another reference as well)
Â
If you can please talk about whistle blowing, employee rights and that i agree that the court ruled in favor of crawford.
Â
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k y-----------ou -----------for----------- yo-----------ur -----------int-----------ere-----------st -----------and----------- bu-----------yin-----------g m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l b-----------e q-----------uic-----------kly-----------