The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 398 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
Consider the join of R and S described in Exercise 12.4.
1. With 52 buffer pages, if unclustered B+ indexes existed on R.a and S.b, would either provide a cheaper alternative for performing the join (using an index nested loops join) than a block nested loops join? Explain.
(a) Would your answer change if only five buffer pages were available?
(b) Would your answer change if S contained only 10 tuples instead of 2,000 tuples?
2. With 52 buffer pages, if clustered B+ indexes existed on R.a and S.b, would either provide a cheaper alternative for performing the join (using the index nested loops algorithm) than a block nested loops join? Explain
(a) Would your answer change if only five buffer pages were available?
(b) Would your answer change if S contained only 10 tuples instead of 2,000 tuples?
3. If only 15 buffers were available, what would be the cost of a sort-merge join? What would be the cost of a hash join?
4. If the size of S were increased to also be 10,000 tuples, but only 15 buffer pages were available, what would be the cost of a sort-merge join? What would be the cost of a hash join?
5. If the size of S were increased to also be 10,000 tuples, and 52 buffer pages were available, what would be the cost of sort-merge join? What would be the cost of hash join?
Exercise 12.4
Consider the joinÂ
, given the following information about the relations to be joined. The cost metric is the number of page I/Os unless otherwise noted, and the cost of writing out the result should be uniformly ignored.
Relation R contains 10,000 tuples and has 10 tuples per page.
Relation S contains 2,000 tuples and also has 10 tuples per page.
Attribute b of relation S is the primary key for S.
Both relations are stored as simple heap files.
Neither relation has any indexes built on it.
52 buffer pages are available.
1. What is the cost of joining R and S using a page-oriented simple nested loops join? What is the minimum number of buffer pages required for this cost to remain unchanged?
2. What is the cost of joining R and S using a block nested loops join? What is the minimum number of buffer pages required for this cost to remain unchanged?
3. What is the cost of joining R and S using a sort-merge join? What is the minimum number of buffer pages required for this cost to remain unchanged?
4. What is the cost of joining R and S using a hash join? What is the minimum number of buffer pages required for this cost to remain unchanged?
5. What would be the lowest possible I/O cost for joining R and S using any join algorithm, and how much buffer space would be needed to achieve this cost? Explain briefly.
6. How many tuples will the join of R and S produce, at most, and how many pages would be required to store the result of the join back on disk?
7. Would your answers to any of the previous questions in this exercise change if you are told that R.a is a foreign key that refers to S.b?
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- Â----------- -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.-----------Ple-----------ase----------- pi-----------ng -----------me -----------on -----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be----------- ca-----------tch-----------