Maurice Tutor

(5)

$15/per page/Negotiable

About Maurice Tutor

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Biology,Calculus,Chemistry,Economics,English,Essay writing,Geography,Geology,Health & Medical,Physics,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 402 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 66690
Tutorials Posted: 66688

Education

  • MCS,PHD
    Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
    Nov-2005 - Oct-2011

Experience

  • Professor
    Phoniex University
    Oct-2001 - Nov-2016

Category > Accounting Posted 02 Aug 2017 My Price 12.00

Australian Taxation law

Australian Taxation law

 

 

Part One: Income tax rates Martha is a resident who is 40 years old and has $170,000 of taxable income for the current income year. Calculate her basic income tax liability.

 

(hints: Medicare levy, medical levy, surcharge ,how to calculate medical levy surcharge give example why you have medical levy surcharge )

 

 

 

Part Two: Ordinary income In 1979, a doctor who lived and worked in Sydney purchased a 20 acre parcel of rural land on the outskirts of the city for $100,000. Over the years, he used the property as a “hobby farm” for growing “fruit trees” and as a “weekend retreat” for relaxation. Recently, the surrounding area has become more developed and the property has increased in value substantially. The doctor has also recently run into financial difficulties as a result of a malpractice suit and he is considering selling the property. Advise him as to whether he would be required to include any amount in his assessable income as a result of the sale.

 

(hints:1 is his resident property or not ? 2assume some figure ,ordinary income ,statutory income give explanation 2 case reference 1. statham & anor vs FC of T 89 ACT 4070 2. Casimaty vs FCof T 97 ACT 5135 Court judgments)

 

 

 

Part Three: General deductions Compare the decision in FC of T v Anstis (2009) with the decisions in Lunney and Hayley v FC of T (1958) and FC of T v Maddalena. Is it possible to reconcile the outcomes in these cases?

 

(hints: self education expenses. this case study will give two judgment 1 paragraph for 1 case each. no reconcile court judgment is final two judgment will be passed and both are right, opinion should be given)

 

 

 

Part Four: Provisions that deny or limit deductions Discuss some of the circumstances in which entertainment expenditure is deductible?

 

(hints :one and a half page write in own words only case reference correctly no need to explain case study)

 

Answers

(5)
Status NEW Posted 02 Aug 2017 03:08 PM My Price 12.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.-----------Ple-----------ase----------- pi-----------ng -----------me -----------on -----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be----------- ca-----------tch-----------

Not Rated(0)
Relevent Questions