The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
University
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 438 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 9562 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 9559 |
bachelor in business administration
Polytechnic State University Sanluis
Jan-2006 - Nov-2010
CPA
Polytechnic State University
Jan-2012 - Nov-2016
Professor
Harvard Square Academy (HS2)
Mar-2012 - Present
Project Analysis You are discussing a project analysis with a co-worker. The project involves real options, such as expanding the project if successful, or abandoning the project if it fails. Your co-worker makes the following statement: “This analysis is ridiculous. We looked at expanding or abandoning the project in two years, but there are many other options we should consider. For example, we could expand in one year, and expand further in two years. Or we could expand in one year, and abandon the project in two years. There are too many options for us to examine. Because of this, anything this analysis would give us is worthless.” How would you evaluate this statement? Considering that with any capital budgeting project there are an infinite number of real options, when do you stop the option analysis on an individual project?
We -----------sto-----------p o-----------pti-----------on -----------ana-----------lys-----------is -----------whe-----------n t-----------he -----------ind-----------ivi-----------dua-----------l p-----------roj-----------ect----------- ha-----------s a----------- ne-----------gat-----------ive----------- NP-----------V. -----------Add-----------iti-----------ona-----------l a-----------nal-----------ysi-----------s o-----------n a-----------n i-----------ndi-----------vid-----------ual----------- pr-----------oje-----------ct -----------is -----------don-----------e i-----------n o-----------rde-----------r t-----------o k-----------now----------- wh-----------eth-----------er -----------the-----------re