3.  If a warranty were created, would Oscar have to pay for the linguine in clam sauce?

1. a.Yes, Melnick needed to feed twenty people, and he did so (as long as the amount and price of the linguine in clam sauce was a reasonable substitute for the missing food on the party platter).
2. b.No, since Oscar said if you are not sure, you should order extra food.
3. c.No, Melnick should have ordered food more similar to the party platter.
4. d.No, Melnick would have no right to order more food.

4.  Assume that Oscar did put the amount of food that "all supermarkets put in a party platter for twenty," is this relevant?

1. a.Yes, since trade customs may modify an implied warranty.
2. b.No, since it must feed Melnick's twenty particular guests.
3. c.No, since Melnick did not know that and was not made aware of it.
4. d.No, since the label specifically said "feeds twenty" a trade custom is not relevant.

5.  Knowing that Oscar was not putting the actual amount of food he said, what warranties is he violating?

1. a.An express warranty only.
2. b.The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose only.
3. c.Both an express warranty and an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
4. d.No warranties.

SophiaPretty

(5)

Status NEW Posted 04 Aug 2017 02:08 PM My Price 6.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k y-----------ou -----------for----------- yo-----------ur -----------int-----------ere-----------st -----------and----------- bu-----------yin-----------g m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l b-----------e q-----------uic-----------kly-----------

Not Rated(0)

• Buy Answer