The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Jul 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 304 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 15833 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 15827 |
MBA,PHD, Juris Doctor
Strayer,Devery,Harvard University
Mar-1995 - Mar-2002
Manager Planning
WalMart
Mar-2001 - Feb-2009
No more than 1 page single spaced 12in font times new roman.
Read article first http://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2016/07/06/cannabis-capitalist-scotts-miracle-gro-ceo-bets-big-on-pot-growers/#889aa3d38cfe
1st paragraph- Introduction: Start your analysis by giving a brief overview of the article (no more than 1-2 paragraphs). Many times, this is an excellent place in your essay to state the problem, if one exists, that the authors are attempting to evaluate. Answer this in intro paragraph (Dispensing with the personal saga for the moment, what were some of the obstacles facing Jim when he decided to invest in the cannabis industry? What was the catalyst for Jim's idea?)Â
Â
Body of the paper answer these four questions. So, in the body,you need to flesh them out while also answering the DQ's. The format I require is that of the somewhat antiquated essay that is still used in the world (known as Memorandums, forexample). Each paragraph has a topic sentence, which is the main idea, and usually 1-3 supporting sentences. I would answer each DQ in a different paragraph.
1.) Utilizing the Resource Based View in chapter 4 and lecture, define cannabis as a strategic resource.
2. Relate, if you can, how Jim grew up—his experiences—with his tenacity to make"extreme decisions."
3. Where is Jim going with the cannabis division now? Where are his sights for the future?
4. If you had to do a brief SWOT analysis for Scott's Miracle-Gro with Jim at the helm, what would you include? Remember that SW refers to internal evaluations and OT refers to external evaluations (p. 33).
Conclusion- The conclusion is the last paragraph of your paper in which you address how you felt about the relevance of the article and whether or not you felt the article was of interest. This is where you highlight in 1 paragraph what you thought were the most important, relevant, or intriguing aspects of the article. You could also elect to write that you were not impressed because you thought the article was too pedestrian or hackneyed. Regardless of which way you swing, you must give an insightful reason.
Attachments:
----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll -----------be -----------qui-----------ckl-----------y