The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 402 Weeks Ago, 3 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 66690 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 66688 |
MCS,PHD
Argosy University/ Phoniex University/
Nov-2005 - Oct-2011
Professor
Phoniex University
Oct-2001 - Nov-2016
Marsha Quigley filed her return for 2009 and reported taxable income computed as follows. AGI (includes $2,000 state income tax refund previously deducted with a tax benefit) $80,000 Personal exemption. (3,650) Misc. Itemized deductions in excess (28,000) Of 2% of AGI Taxable income. $48,350 Although Masha had state and local tax expense of $9,000, she chose not to deduct them in calculating taxable income. Masha believed that she claimed the state and local taxes, she would be subject to the AMT. As a result, she filed her Form 1040 as a single individual and reported a tax liability of $8,281. Upon audit of the return, the IRS concluded that Masha should have included $9,000 of state and local taxes in her itemized deductions. Thus, her decision not to deduct the state and local taxes did not relieve her from being subject to the AMT. Who is correct? Explain
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------n.P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll