The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 292 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 27237 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 27372 |
MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
Devry University
Sep-2004 - Aug-2010
Assistant Financial Analyst
NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
Aug-2007 - Jul-2017
Please read my attchments carefully.
I need A++ work.
PROJECT D: ICT SUMMARY: (Worth 100 points – DUE LAST DAY OF CLASS)
Consider that you have just been appointed the “ICT Coordinator” for 1 of the 8 regions that we have reviewed in class.
Create a strategy to move the region forward in regards to ICT Networked Readiness. Please use concepts, frameworks and examples found in the readings (handout or your textbook).
The “Plan for the Region” should be between 5 and 10 pages in length. Make sure that you explain all the factors of the environment that must be changed, radically changed or supported.
Be creative however, consider resources and governments in the area. What can you change and what will meet resistance?
Consider creating a SWOT analysis of the region – if you obtain this analysis from the Internet – make sure you document the source and then add your analysis to the segment.
Important Note: Plagiarism or the purchase of papers will result in automatic failure (“F”) for the course.
My Rubric –
|
The Assignment Objective |
The Paper is off the assignment. It does not meet the requirements. |
Paper meets some of the aspects of the assigned requirements. |
Paper follows the assignment at a better-than-average level. |
Paper meets all the requirements of the assignment. It is exciting to read. |
|
Organization of the paper |
No introduction, not an easy read. The paper does not have a conclusion. |
Intro is weak, paragraphs are unlinked. The paper has redundant info. Conclusion is weak. |
Intro is clear, paragraphs are developed, but has weak conclusion. |
The intro is captivating. Paragraphs are fully developed and have a logical flow, good transitions, and a persuasive conclusion. |
|
Integration of source materials |
There are times when sources are not cited and obviously not the author's words. |
The author has a good sense of what is a credible source. Sources are not always cited correctly. |
There are reputable sources to support the argument in the paper. |
The author correctly introduces each paraphrase, summary and quotes in the sentence and sources are listed. |
Plagiarism and Other Forms of Cheating:
Any student who plagiarizes work for these course assignments will fail the course. Plagiarism includes but is not limited to the following:
· Submitting someone else’s written work – from the Internet, another printed source, or another student, as if this material were the students. If using such material, the student must document the source within the submitted paper.
· Submitting work that paraphrases the language, ideas or structure of someone else’s written project without acknowledgement.
Attachments:
----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll